Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery
November 16, 2006

Early And Midterm Results Of Ruptured AAA In The Endovascular Era In A Community Hospital

Back to Annual Meeting
Back to Program
Paul M. Anain, MD1, Joseph M. Anain, Sr., MD1, Michael Tiso2, Hasan H. Dosluoglu, MD3.
1Sister's of Charity Hospital, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA, 2University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA, 3SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Objectives: Endovascular repair(EVAR) have been increasingly used for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms(rAAA), especially in major academic centers. The goal of this paper is to report our results with EVAR-first approach for rAAA which we adopted since 2001 in our community hospital.
Methods: All consecutive patients with who underwent attempted repair for rAAA between 02/2001-07/2006 were analyzed. Only patients with CT/visual verification of extraluminal blood were included.
Results: Thirty-one patients (23/males,mean age 78(51-89)) underwent attempted EVAR for rAAA, constituting 4.2% of all EVAR cases(738). Eighteen(58%) were transferred from another institution. CT was performed in 96%. On arrival to ER, 39% were hypotensive(SBP<80mmHg). Balloon occlusion(BO) was used in 10 (transfemoral). AneuRx(22), Zenith(5) and Ancure(3) grafts were used(93%,bifurcated). Length of surgery was 144(77-230) minutes. EVAR was completed in 94% (iliac anatomy, proximal endoleak caused open conversion in 2). Five patients(16%) died within 30 days (4 required BO). Mean length-of-stay was 9.5(5-30) days. Two patients died (7,9months,unrelated) and 6(23%) required secondary procedures (5 femorofemoral bypasses for limb occlusions, one proximal cuff for type-I endoleak causing repeat rupture) during a mean follow-up of 16(3-39) months. Mortality was 44%(4/9) in patients who underwent open procedures during this period, with overall mortality of 22.5% for all ruptures treated.
Conclusions: Our results show that EVAR is feasible with favorable outcomes in patients presenting with rAAA in a busy community hospital. There is a high secondary intervention rate, which can potentially be decreased by ensuring good iliac limb anatomy at the end of the procedure and a closer follow-up.


Back to Annual Meeting
Back to Program