Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery
December 17, 2007

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR): A Non-Academic Community Hospital’s Experience

Back to Annual Symposium
Back to Program
Nicholas Madden, BS1, Arthur DeMarsico, DO2, Robert Rhee, MD1, Rabih A. Chaer, MD1.
1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2Altoona Regional Hospital, Altoona, PA, USA.

OBJECTIVES: EVAR has become the first line treatment of AAA. Outcomes outside of the tertiary care setting remain unknown. The purpose of this study is to report on the mid-term outcomes of EVAR in a community based hospital setting.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 75 elective consecutive EVARs performed at a single community hospital was performed between May 2002 and December 2006. Follow up included a CT scan at 3, 6, and 12 months.
RESULTS:
A bifurcated modular graft was used in all cases. Most patients were in a high-risk modified Goldman class II/III. The mean preoperative aneurysm diameter was 55±9mm, and the mean aortic neck length was 15.5±14mm. There were no open conversions, and no major complications. The mean hospital stay was 1.5± 1.6 days. The mean follow-up was 18 months. There were no postoperative ruptures or aneurysm related death. There were no graft migrations or type I endoleaks. There was a 7% decrease in mean aneurysm diameter at follow up. Reintervention with coil embolization was required for 2 patients for persistent type II endoleak. At 24 months, the freedom from aneurysm related death was 100%, the freedom from secondary interventions was 91%, and the freedom from endoleak was 69%. Overall Survival was 97% at 2 years (Fig 1). CONCLUSIONS: EVAR at a community hospital is safe and durable, even in a high risk population, with outcomes comparable to tertiary care centers. EVAR should be the first line treatment for elective AAA in the community setting.


Back to Annual Symposium
Back to Program
© 2009 Copyright Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery