Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery
December 17, 2007

DEFINING THE CARE GAP IN AAA SCREENING: PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO IMPROVED GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION

Back to Annual Symposium
Back to Program
Douglas L. Wooster, MD, Andrew Dueck, MD, Elizabeth Wooster, BComm.
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Despite well-publicized guidelines for AAA screening, there has been limited implementation of these by primary care physicians. The aims of this study were to identify barriers specific to ultrasound (U/S) AAA screening, identify the interactions within the clinical care team and propose implementation strategies.
METHODS: Stakeholder groups of primary care physicians (PCP), imaging specialists (IS) and vascular specialists (VS) were identified. Structured surveys and semi-structured focus groups were used with each.
RESULTS: All groups believed in screening in general, that AAA was an important disease and U/S was the best test (78 - 90%). Awareness of guidelines varied: IS 12%, PCP 42%, VS 78%. 61% of PCP saw >12 eligible pts/week but 77% screened <20%. VS screen <60% if carotid disease or PAD (84 - 86%) and <20% if VV (76%). Patient characteristics, costs and availability of resources were not seen as barriers. PCP & IS were uncertain of the evidence, cost-effectiveness and whether patients had had a previous U/S. VS had ethical concerns and noted that PCP should initiate screening. VS would advocate for screening (67%) but IS were reluctant to (20 - 30%). All agreed that guideline implementation should be patient-centered, expert/opinion leader reinforced and supported by reminders. There was limited interest in government initiatives, EMR or internet training modules.
CONCLUSION: A care gap was identified related to knowledge and practice gaps. Multifaceted implementation strategies with coherent team interactions and advocacy are required to enhance guideline uptake and optimize patient care.


Back to Annual Symposium
Back to Program