Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery
November 04, 2009

Outcomes With Heparin-Bonded Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts Used as a Conduit for Hemodialysis

Back to Annual Meeting
Back to Program
Javier E. Anaya-Ayala, MD, Candace D. Pettigrew, Zulfiqar F. Cheema, MD, PhD, Jean X. Bismuth, MD, Mark G. Davies, MD, PhD, MBA, Joseph J. Naoum, MD, Alan B. Lumsden, MD, Eric K. Peden, MD.
Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Background: Obtaining and maintaining dialysis access after failure of autologous access sites remains a concern for access surgeons. PTFE is the most common conduit used. Heparin-bonded expanded PTFE graft (Gore PropatenVascular Graft) may offer benefits because it is designed to provide resistance to thrombosis and decrease the development of intimal hyperplasia.
Purpose: This retrospective study reviews clinical outcomes using this graft as a hemodialyisis access conduit since its introduction in 2006.
Method: From March 2007 to March 2008, 50 patients (23 males (46%) mean age of 58.7 yo) all adults with ESRD, underwent placement of arteriovenous Heparin-bonded ePTFE graft. Patency, re-intervention, infection and access function rates were examined, and factors influencing their outcomes determined.
Results: All grafts were patent immediately after implantation. During a mean follow-up time of 24 months, only 14 (28%) patients are still successfully using the graft for hemodialysis. A total of 24 (48%) patients died of non-graft related causes during the follow up period. 19 cases of thrombosis occurred, 7 resolved after secondary intervention. Wound infection occurred in 7 (14%) patients and 1 patient required graft removal. 6 (12%) cases of pseudoaneurysm occurred and 8 (16%) of steal syndrome were reported. Primary patency rate (PPR), Assisted primary patency rate (APPR) and Secondary patency rate (SPR) of the graft are summarize in table I.
Conclusion: Heparin-bonded ePTFE graft is a viable alternative for hemodialyisis access. In this retrospective study this graft demonstrated encouraging results superior to the current literature controls. However, long-term prospective and randomized studies are necessary to determine whether this graft provides results superior to those achieved with other prostheses.

Table I:
Primary Patency Rate(%) Assisted Primary Patency Rate(%) Secondary Patency Rate(%)
1 year 64+7 72+7 76+6
2 year 29+7 35+7 50+9

Back to Annual Meeting
Back to Program